Time Wasters – This Magazine https://this.org Progressive politics, ideas & culture Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:10:29 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.4 https://this.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/cropped-Screen-Shot-2017-08-31-at-12.28.11-PM-32x32.png Time Wasters – This Magazine https://this.org 32 32 Wednesday WTF: We watched the PM on YouTube so you don't have to https://this.org/2010/03/17/stephen-harper-youtube/ Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:10:29 +0000 http://this.org/?p=4204 Stephen Harper on YouTube

Most videos on YouTube are total fiascos, but at least they’re entertaining fiascos. Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s debut on YouTube—in which he responded with carefully prepared talking points to carefully screened video questions in a carefully pre-taped appearance—was dull because there was nothing at stake. It was like watching a man walk a tightrope across his own bathtub. But at This Magazine, we bravely suffer so you don’t have to. Here are the semi-notable bits you missed, even though you knew exactly what was going to be asked and what the answers would be. Behold!

Afghan detainees!

Q: Why is the government not more open about the Afghan detainee issue?

A: Yeah, well, first of all it’s important to say I don’t agree with the premise of the question.  First of all, this, you know, this issue has been bandied around now for nearly four years.  And yet we have no evidence that Canadian soldiers have done anything wrong. […] I think our men and women in uniform and other public servants have been doing a, you know, a good job in Afghanistan under extremely difficult conditions.  I think they do deserve our support.

Climate change!

Q: Climate change is obviously affecting the weather here in Canada.  Is your government willing to take the strong measures necessary to adequately deal with climate change?

A: [W]e said we needed a treaty that covers all emissions, and that’s the agreement we got at Copenhagen.  Now, it’s not perfect, but at least for the first time, we have virtually every country in the world saying they will be part of an effort that will include their emissions.  So we’re obviously making commitments under that agreement, and further negotiation will go forward internationally in the next year or so to try and hammer out some more details and that. […] This is, you know, this is not an easy area.  I think what all your viewers should realize is what causes emissions is economic activity.  You know, all emissions virtually are caused by either people heating themselves or moving around or engaged in economic activity of some kind.  So to change our energy use carbon footprint over time requires the development and adaptation of a new generation of technology, and that’s what we’re trying to do.

Childcare!

Q: Offering families $1200 a year for childcare doesn’t even make a dent in the actual cost of childcare, and that plan, to be quite frank, is an insult to any family that actually relies on it.

A: First of all, Canadians want to make their own childcare decisions.  I think probably my own family was not a typical…we used a combination.  You know, sometimes we looked after the kids at home, sometimes we used, or part of the time we used a daycare.  We also used family members or we paid babysitters, so…and I think you’ll actually see that a lot of Canadians have a lot of different childcare needs. […] [W]e had a previous government that promised to create a national childcare system for many years.  They spent billions of dollars.  Canadian parents never saw any of that.

The Demon Weed!

Q: A majority of Canadians, when polled, say they believe marijuana should be legal for adults, just like alcohol. Why don’t you end the war on drugs and focus on violent criminals?

A: I know some people say if you just legalized it, you know, you’d get the money and all would be well.  But I think that rests on the assumption that somehow drugs are bad because they’re illegal. […] The reason drugs are illegal is because they are bad.  And even if these things were legalized, I can predict with a lot of confidence that these would never be respectable businesses run by respectable people.

Here’s the video in full if you’re interested.

]]>
Friday FTW: "Bottled water blinds puppies" https://this.org/2009/07/31/friday-ftw-bottled-water-blinds-puppies/ Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:14:49 +0000 http://this.org/?p=2199 Bottled water causes blindness in puppies - via Tappening

[On Wednesday, we introduced the first in our new WTF/FTW series of blog posts. Today we bring you the flipside of Wednesday WTF (bad/crazy/stupid news): Friday FTW (good/awesome/fun news).]

U.S. website Tappening, a project and blog advocating that you ditch bottled water and drink from the tap like a normal person, launched a separate microsite this week, StartALie.com. Operating on the notion that if the bottled water industry lies about its product all the time — that bottled water is healthier, purer, less contaminated, environmentally friendly, etc — StartALie fires back with its own lies about the industry, made up by readers. They include:

  • 32% of profits from bottle water are used to support Eastern European art thieves.
  • Studies show bottled water causes tooth decay.
  • Prolonged consumption of bottled water can cause erectile dysfunction.
  • Bottled water caused the mortgage crisis.
  • Bottled water creates inane web site posts!

That last one proves to be true; StartALie is now filled with Russian spam, juvenile poop jokes, and assorted other interwebs jetsam. But the project is attention-grabbing and fun, with less of the usual tut-tutting that accompanies many of these awareness-raising campaigns. Tappening’s blog aggregates news and opinion about tap water vs. bottled water, and they sell some smart-looking BPA-free bottles to carry your own tap water wherever you go.

]]>
So bad it's "Goode" https://this.org/2009/05/27/so-bad-its-goode/ Wed, 27 May 2009 21:29:48 +0000 http://this.org/?p=1760 The Goode Family: Putting a cartoon face on P.C. thuggery

The Goode Family: Putting a cartoon face on P.C. thuggery

At a yuppie-friendly health food supermarket, Helen Goode pushes her shopping cart down the produce aisle. She reaches a mound of green apples reading “Conventionally Harvested $3.99/lb.” Just beside these lies another mound of apples, labeled “Organic $5.49/lb”, followed by a selection of “Sustainably Harvested Organic” apples, then “Locally Grown Sustainably Harvested Organic” apples, then “ Fair Trade Locally Grown Sustainably Harvested Organic” apples, which are priced at $10.99/lb. Helen looks defeated as a seemingly unending selection of green apples looms ahead.

Helen Goode is the matriarch of the forthcoming ABC animated comedy, “The Goode Family,” Mike Judge’s latest offering for the post-“Stuff White People Like” era. Judge is probably best known for his last cartoon sitcom, “King of the Hill,” which spent much of its 13 seasons gently chiding the neurotic tendencies of the self-consciously politically correct left.

Where the Hill family of “ King of the Hill” served as a down-homey foil for the kinds of uppity shenanigans Judge seems to relish in jabbing, the Goodes are both the setup and the punchline. Their dog, named Che, is vegan; their adopted South African son Ubuntu—whom they thought would be black but turned out to be the flaxen-haired son of Afrikaaners—dresses like Queen Latifah circa 1992; gas emissions from excessive driving are forgiven because “what’s important is that you feel guilty about it.”

At a time where political correctness and environmental consciousness have become second nature for many of us, is a show like “The Goode Family” even relevant? For everyone out there who knows someone who’s just a little too obnoxiously upstanding—and we all do—the answer is likely yes.

]]>
Rinky-dink ink tinkering isn't the answer https://this.org/2009/01/08/rinky-dink-ink-tinkering-isnt-the-answer/ Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:57:19 +0000 http://this.org/blog/2009/01/08/rinky-dink-ink-tinkering-isnt-the-answer/ EcoFont alphabet
A Dutch design firm has released a new computer font, Ecofont, that they say uses less ink, and can therefore reduce the e-waste that results from depleted toner cartridges. It’s a regular-looking font except that it’s riddled with holes, and the firm, Spranq, claims this reduces toner use by up to 20 per cent.
Their hearts are in the right place, but this is clearly public-relations bunk. (And I realize I’m playing into it by linking to them.) There are plenty of environmental problems in the world, and technology waste is some of the most difficult to deal with. But the real effect of this font is statistically insignificant, and no one should be fooled into thinking it’s a real solution to any of our pressing environmental problems.
This kind of “environmental” measure is increasingly common — easy to implement, emotionally gratifying, socially acceptable, and totally ineffectual. You would be better off turning on the ink-saving features now available in every modern printer; even better would be choosing not to print that two-line email in the first place.
This morning on Twitter I linked to a new advertisement from the World Wildlife Fund that makes a crucial point: consumers and end-users are being constantly scolded to change their behaviours and reduce their environmental footprint while government and industry continue to allow damaging beahviour to go unchecked. Individual efforts like installing compact fluorescent lightbulbs and downloading an “Ecofont” are fine, but they won’t get us where we need to go unless the biggest and baddest polluters are brought to heel.

]]>
Stephen Harper's Twitter profile. LOL! https://this.org/2008/09/03/stephen-harpers-twitter-profile-lol/ Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:41:25 +0000 http://this.org/blog/2008/09/03/stephen-harpers-twitter-profile-lol/ Twitter Logo
This email just landed in my inbox:

Hi, This Magazine.
Stephen Harper (pmharper) is now following your updates on Twitter.
Check out Stephen Harper’s profile here:
http://twitter.com/pmharper
Best,
Twitter

I’m not sure, but I have my doubts about whether the PM and This Magazine are going to be BFF’s.
Still, this is a good way to introduce you to This Magazine’s Twitter feed. If you’re not familiar with Twitter, you can find out more about it here. Basically, it’s a very tiny blog: we use it to point you toward interesting news articles throughout the day, and updates to our blog show up there too.
You can see our Twitter page and start following our exploits (140 characters at a time) at twitter.com/thismagazine.

]]>
Porn Pressure https://this.org/2007/02/23/porn-pressure/ Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:14:46 +0000 http://this.org/blog/2007/02/23/porn-pressure/ images.jpg
Adult content though your cellphone is officially canned due to pressure from concerned parents and Catholic lobby groups. Is sex and sexuality becoming repressed in an increasingly conservative North American climate? Or are companies finally being challenged on profiting off sexual content? Discuss.

]]>
Fox News fails to replicate Daily Show https://this.org/2007/02/19/fox-news-fails-to-replicate-daily-show/ Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:19:21 +0000 http://this.org/blog/2007/02/19/fox-news-fails-to-replicate-daily-show/ Some people seem to think that The Daily Show with Jon Stewart is losing its edge. While it’s true the era-defining satirical news show has lost a number of fine correspondents, I find the writing and analysis to be as sharp as ever on most nights. And if you need something to remind you of how good it is, try a simple comparative analysis.

Fox News has launched its own spoof show, The Half Hour News Hour, which only deserves laughs for its sorry attempts at humour. The following clip has received roughly 400,000 views, but judging from the comments its “popularity” must be due to people’s voyeuristic need to see it for themselves. And it truly is awful, with a laugh track complete with a loudly guffawing man and incredibly lame jokes told by a stern-faced anchor. See it for yourself, then thank the heavens we still have The Daily Show.

]]>
At the end of the day, all porn is handheld https://this.org/2007/02/14/at-the-end-of-the-day-all-porn-is-handheld/ Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:26:28 +0000 http://this.org/blog/2007/02/14/at-the-end-of-the-day-all-porn-is-handheld/ Porn is a bellwether of media format success. Typically, its seedly, unspoken nature, at least according to prudish Western sensibilities, belies the fact that it has proven time and time again to be a pioneer on new technology fronts.
Take, for example, the internet. While the battle fields of the world wide web lies scattered with the carcasses of many unmonetized dot.coms, Porn has proven itself a stalwart and profitable colonizer. Looking further back to the eighties, Betamax’s superior quality standards were thwarted in part by the porn industries rally behind the VHS format. The current high definition format war between Blueray and HD-DVD is claimed to be actively courting the porn industry to “strongly influence” the balance of adoption to their respective formats. So with porn’s pioneering track record in check, where is there left to conquer?
Wireless.
Canada’s adoption for wireless benchmarked versus the rest of the world is markedly slow. This molasses-like pace is linked to many reasons including Canada’s lower levels of disposable income, high network to low population density cost ratios, and a national competitive set consisting of only three giant, fiscally conservative telecoms.
While countries like South Korean, the UK and Japan continue to innovate laps around Canada with average consumers lapping up streaming TV, radio, games, customized downloads, instant messaging, email, social networking and GPS/LBS services all from their mobile devices, the average Canadian consumer remains in the dark ages with single digit percentages of Canadians using, let alone aware of such capabilities.
Enter Porn.
Given that the telecom trinity is reluctant to drop prices to increase consumer uptake on wireless services, adult content again becomes a pioneering spirit of, pardon the pun, “sex it and they will come.”
Of the top 25 Web sites visited by Telus customers via their handsets in December, more than half were adult sites, Telus spokesman Jim Johannsson said. So if people are already seeking it out on their own volition, why not provide more of it? And charge $3-4 per item? The economics of it are a no-brainer.
The old tennet of “sex sells”, holds true. In this case, perhaps sex sells cellular, but it is nearly unfathomable that any modern man or woman did not any any stage of their emerging sexual identity did not look a piece of porn. Because the lesser know tennent of “sex wanted is less than sex gotten” also holds true, sex and sex proxies have an ascribed value similar to any scare resource. Once a subsegment of people try paying for adult mobile content, people will be disposed to try other types of mobile content. Since Canadians have show reluctance to pay for more acceptable mobile content such as music or tv, adult content, becomes a more seductive ringer albeit on a teeny tiny mobile screen.
So why did it take so long for porn to make it to the mobile handset?
Without trying to sound like a broken record, it breaks down to the conservative nature of the telecoms and the prudish Western sensibilities on sex and pornography. Canadian telecoms are notorious for having a tight leash on content control over their airwaves. Unless you’re crafty enough to have obtained an unlocked GSM phone from Chinatown, very little gets on or off the handset without authorization. The recent Catholic Church furor over Telus’ initiative to monetize adult content is both expected and fading. Can you imagine if religious groups even tried to remove porn from hotel pay-per-views across the country? Inconceivable! In fact, the other two telecoms, Rogers and Bell, are likely waiting in the wings to launch their own adult content services while Telus navigates the theo-political minefield.
But at the end of the day, porn, as uncomfortable as it makes people feel (at least publically), should have an acceleration effect on Canadians using their handsets beyond just voice service. To Telus’ credit, they are “giving consumers the option to access it in a responsible way, with proper age verification and ensuring that the content is actually legal for download in Canada.” It took Canadian Idol to help mainstream text messaging to the broad Canadian public. If it takes adult content to eventually mainstream mobile phones as multimedia devices, personally I would consider that a less heinous price to pay with just a shred more dignity.

]]>
Procrastination deluxe https://this.org/2006/10/20/procrastination-deluxe/ Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:52:54 +0000 http://this.org/blog/2006/10/20/procrastination-deluxe/ It’s Friday, and if you can’t find anything to procrastinate with, you’re just not trying hard enough. (Try it on “manic mode” for best results.)

]]>