Canadian Journalists for Free Expression – This Magazine https://this.org Progressive politics, ideas & culture Thu, 19 May 2011 16:24:43 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.4 https://this.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/cropped-Screen-Shot-2017-08-31-at-12.28.11-PM-32x32.png Canadian Journalists for Free Expression – This Magazine https://this.org 32 32 This45: Arif Noorani on Canadian Journalists for Free Expression https://this.org/2011/05/19/this45-arif-noorani-canadian-journalists-free-expression/ Thu, 19 May 2011 16:24:43 +0000 http://this.org/magazine/?p=2543 A protester at a Vancouver demonstration calling for Canadian al Jazeera journalist Dorothy Parvaz to be freed by Syria's government. Photo by al Jazeera/Isaac Oomen.

A protester at a Vancouver demonstration calling for Canadian al Jazeera journalist Dorothy Parvaz to be freed by Syria's government. Photo by al Jazeera/Isaac Oomen.

I’m sitting in a room surrounded by hundreds of people, kindred spirits, a number of whom would normally not cross paths. Chiselled-faced anchors sit side by side with journalists who have been exiled from their homes around the world.

Then a series of startling images jolt me up in my seat. Footage of riot police in full gear, faces covered, knocking journalists to the ground, along with demonstrators. A news photographer tells a story of being shot with a rubber bullet. This isn’t Gaza City or Cairo. It’s Toronto, during the G20 Summit in June 2010.

A few minutes later, a voice emanates from above, directly from Cameroon. It’s the brother-in-law of Cameroonian journalist Bibi Ngota, who died in prison. He’s listening in on cellphone and recording the evening’s events on his end, to be broadcast on radio later.

It was a powerful moment at a gala organized by the Canadian Journalists for Free Expression, a group that got its start 30 years ago. The organization was appalled at the kidnapping and murder of media workers during the bloody civil wars in Latin America of the 1980s. After a few decades and a couple name changes later, the CJFE has become enormously ambitious, mixing together high principles with clear-eyed pragmatism. The group’s president, a committed unionist, thanks a major bank for supporting its work building connections with Latin American journalists. Some of those journalists are here tonight.

Throughout it all, CJFE has avoided the false dichotomy that afflicts groups working on human rights internationally: that injustice only exists “over there.”

At home, CJFE has fought hard to broaden press freedom in Canada. It’s zeroed in on overreaching libel cases meant to silence journalists. It’s campaigned for more open access to information laws and is now pushing for an inquiry into the actions of police during the G20 Summit. Each year it reminds us that, even on our own doorstep, journalists can be targets of violence, naming an award after Tara Singh Hayer. Hayer was an outspoken Canadian journalist and editor of Vancouver’s Indo-Canadian Times who had been critical of Sikh extremism, and was murdered for those views in 1998.

Internationally, the group has broadened in its scope from Latin America to all corners of the globe. CJFE created a program for exiled journalists, lobbies for the release of detained media workers, and now runs what the group calls the world’s largest free-expression network, IFEX (International Freedom of Expression Exchange), which monitors abuses in over 60 countries.

Whether it’s drug cartels or corrupt regimes, CJFE has (often against the odds) tried to hold the powerful to account at home and abroad, firmly believing that democracy rises and falls based on the freedom of its media.

Arif Noorani Then: This Magazine editorial board member, 2000-04. Now: Executive producer, Q with Jian Ghomeshi and Day 6 with Brent Bambury, CBC Radio.
]]>
Press freedom in Canada now: we've got good news and we've got bad news https://this.org/2010/05/03/press-freedom-day-cjfe-free-expression-review/ Mon, 03 May 2010 15:34:12 +0000 http://this.org/?p=4502 cjfe-free-expression-report-2009-coverToday, which is, appropriately, World Press Freedom Day, Canadian Journalists for Free Expression released their first in what will be an annual series of reports on the state of free expression in Canada. As the authors note in the introduction, 2009 was a notable year in Canadian press freedom:
  • The Supreme Court of Canada established the new “responsible communications” defence to claims of defamation, providing greater latitude in reporting on issues of public interest and beating back libel chill;
  • Federal government transparency took a decisive turn for the worse, so much so that the access to information commissioner pronounced it being at risk of being “totally obliterated”;
  • There were two attacks on members of the “ethnic press” in Canada—a physical assault of the editor of the Canadian Punjabi Press in Brampton, Ont., and the vandalization of the offices of the Uthayan newspaper in Scarborough, Ont.;
  • The Vancouver 2010 Olympics produced a handful of troubling incidents, with reporters harassed by law enforcement, detained on dubious grounds, or turned away at the Canadian border on specious grounds.

The study includes a report card that assigns grades to different institutions and their openness to public scrutiny, or their actions that make that scrutiny possible. The Supreme Court gets an A for the new defamation defence; The Canadian Human Rights Commission gets a B for deeming the hate speech provision of the Canadian Human Rights Code unconstitutional in the Marc Lemire case; on publication bans in the courts, appeals courts get a B+, while trial courts get a C-. Continuing the drumbeat of discontent over the federal government’s lack of transparency, it gets an F:

Here, the only assessment can be a failing grade.We remain bedevilled by the antics of those federal entities that invoke national security at the drop of a hat to restrict the dissemination of vital information to journalists and, in turn, the public. Perhaps this attitude is best exemplified by a recent exchange between a federal government lawyer and the Military Police Complaints Commission, in which the lawyer not only challenged the commission’s right to obtain certain government documents on detainee transfers but went so far as to indicate that he was not at liberty to discuss when those documents might be available. Add to this the countless delays and roadblocks put in the way of access to information and we are left wondering how the prime minister could praise the media’s attempt to hold government accountable while abandoning his own promises of access reforms so loudly trumpeted on the campaign trail.
I’ve embedded the full report below, and it can be downloaded free from the CJFE’s website as well.
]]>